Following on from PharmD_Rodriguez — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Following on from PharmD_Rodriguez — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
quinn_sf said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
quinn_sf said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsquinn_sf said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.