🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesEchocardiographic changes on GLP-1 — my results so far

Echocardiographic changes on GLP-1 — my results so far

james_edin Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 4:47 PM 13 replies 1,554 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 15 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Feb 22, 2025 at 4:47 PM#1

My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

Relative versus absolute is the distinction that gets lost: a 20% relative reduction on a high baseline risk is a large absolute benefit, and the same relative figure on a low baseline risk is a small one.

What I am trying to establish is how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, that is a useful answer and I would rather have it.

12 15mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Feb 22, 2025 at 4:59 PM#2
james_edin said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 → elevated homocysteine → increased cardiovascular risk marker.

The connection: B12 is a cofactor for homocysteine metabolism. Without adequate B12, homocysteine accumulates. This is ironic — taking a CV-protective medication while developing a CV risk factor from reduced nutrition.

Solution: comprehensive vitamin supplementation and regular lab monitoring. Don't let the medication's benefits be undermined by nutritional deficiencies.

13 16mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.BariatricHTX
Senior Member
1,456
7,234
Feb 2024
Houston, TX
Feb 22, 2025 at 5:11 PM#3
DataDave said:
Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 →…

Continuous metabolic monitoring dashboard for cardiovascular risk — I track everything in a spreadsheet and here's the month-over-month trend for my key markers:

Weight: consistent downtrend, -1.5 lbs/week average
Fasting glucose (finger stick): stable at 82 mg/dL
Blood pressure (home): 115/72 average
Resting heart rate: 62 bpm (down from 78)
Waist circumference: down 12 inches total

The resting heart rate improvement correlates with cardiovascular fitness gains. Everything is moving in the right direction.

14 17Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
emily_PDX
Member
245
1,123
Nov 2024
Portland, OR
Feb 22, 2025 at 5:23 PM#4
james_edin said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

Mine went the same way, slower. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

15 18Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Feb 22, 2025 at 6:28 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

james_edin said:
...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

I understand the skepticism — we've all seen "miracle" weight loss solutions come and go. But consider what makes GLP-1 agonists different:

  • Phase 3 RCTs with thousands of participants (not 20-person pilot studies)
  • Published in NEJM, JAMA, Lancet (not press releases)
  • Replicated across multiple independent research groups
  • Proven cardiovascular and renal benefits beyond weight loss
  • Biological mechanism fully characterized at the receptor level

This isn't a fad — it's a new drug class supported by the highest level of clinical evidence. The comparison to past fads is understandable but inappropriate.

Last edited: Feb 23, 2025 at 12:28 AM
16 19chris_chi24, tampaLisa73, KarenAZ_mom and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register