Dr.MetabolicMD said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.MetabolicMD said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Coming at Dr.MetabolicMD’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after Dr.MetabolicMD’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
DoseLogDan said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.