From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Dec 18, 2025 at 1:31 PM#16
27 0hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 18, 2025 at 7:06 PM#17
sean_dublin said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
28 1Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 19, 2025 at 12:41 AM#18
sean_dublin said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
29 2tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDec 19, 2025 at 6:16 AM#19
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Last edited: Dec 19, 2025 at 8:16 AM
30 3Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich, nancy_portland and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report