🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesGLP-1 and peripheral arterial disease — looking for input Page 6

GLP-1 and peripheral arterial disease — looking for input

dan_philly Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:07 PM 44 replies 3,088 viewsPage 6 of 9
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Apr 2, 2024 at 3:35 PM#26
hyun_seoul said:
TrialTracker_MD said: ...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk. In 3,297 T2DM patients with high CV risk: MACE HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02)[1].

Notable: the retinopathy signal in SUSTAIN-6 (HR 1.76) was subsequently attributed to rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy — not a direct drug effect. This has been confirmed in longer-term follow-up studies.

References:
[1] Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.
Last edited: Apr 2, 2024 at 5:35 PM
43 16TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
rick_sfbay
Member
289
1,234
Jan 2025
San Francisco, CA
Apr 3, 2024 at 11:02 PM#27

One thing that is still open after hyun_seoul’s answer:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

44 17NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JennaRN
Senior Member
1,987
8,923
Mar 2024
Colorado
Online
Apr 5, 2024 at 6:28 AM#28
labquiet_amy said:
SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk.

NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

From SELECT trial: MACE at 39 months — 6.5% semaglutide vs 8.0% placebo. ARR = 1.5%. NNT = 67 over 3.3 years.

Compare to established therapies:

InterventionNNTTimeframe
Semaglutide (MACE)673.3 years
Statins primary prevention (MI)~1005 years
Aspirin secondary prevention~772 years

These NNTs are clinically meaningful and comparable to accepted cardiovascular interventions.

Last edited: Apr 5, 2024 at 7:28 AM
45 18BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Apr 6, 2024 at 1:53 PM#29
labquiet_amy said:
SUSTAIN-6 was the first CVOT to show cardiovascular benefit with semaglutide, relevant to cardiovascular risk.

Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 → elevated homocysteine → increased cardiovascular risk marker.

The connection: B12 is a cofactor for homocysteine metabolism. Without adequate B12, homocysteine accumulates. This is ironic — taking a CV-protective medication while developing a CV risk factor from reduced nutrition.

Solution: comprehensive vitamin supplementation and regular lab monitoring. Don't let the medication's benefits be undermined by nutritional deficiencies.

Last edited: Apr 6, 2024 at 4:53 PM
46 19jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
dan_philly
Member
456
2,123
Jul 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Apr 7, 2024 at 9:17 PM#30
JennaRN said:
NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
18 16EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register