🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersLipid panel improvements mega-thread — my results so far Page 2

Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — my results so far

sophie_paris Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 8:23 PM 45 replies 1,710 viewsPage 2 of 9
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Apr 26, 2025 at 3:36 AM#6
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
The single most useful discipline is bringing the whole panel to a clinician rather than one flagged value.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I would drop the "get everything" instinct further than this thread does. Every extra test is another chance at a false positive, and incidental findings have their own cost in scans, biopsies and worry.

7 2steve_okc, dave_SLC, FDA_TrackerJim and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Apr 26, 2025 at 6:26 AM#7
sophie_paris said:
I got a full panel before starting and a repeat at three months, and the second one is more useful than the first purely because I now have something…

PSA: get baseline labs BEFORE starting baseline bloodwork therapy. You need a "before" picture to measure progress. My recommended pre-treatment panel:

  1. CMP + A1C + fasting insulin
  2. Complete lipid panel with particle count if possible
  3. hsCRP, ferritin, B12, vitamin D
  4. Thyroid panel (TSH + free T4)
  5. CBC with differential
  6. Liver panel (ALT, AST, GGT)
  7. DEXA scan or body composition

Total cost at Quest without insurance: ~$200. Worth every penny for the data.

Last edited: Apr 26, 2025 at 10:26 AM
6 1raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DeniseRN_TPA
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Tampa, FL
Apr 26, 2025 at 9:16 AM#8
kate.chem said:
I would drop the "get everything" instinct further than this thread does.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. ApoB is the more informative number and it is cheap. LDL-C estimates cholesterol mass in atherogenic particles; ApoB counts the particles, and it is particle count that tracks risk — which is why the two can disagree and why the disagreement is the clinically interesting case. Triglycerides fall substantially with weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity, HDL moves modestly, and LDL-C often barely moves at all, which surprises people who expected everything to improve together.

5 0tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul, jim_asheville and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
tane_welly
Member
234
1,123
Sep 2024
Wellington, NZ
Apr 26, 2025 at 12:06 PM#9

One thing that is still open after JakeSmashed95’s answer:

How often to repeat it, because quarterly seems to be the convention and I cannot find the reasoning?

4 24marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Apr 27, 2025 at 1:43 AM#10

Reporting back.

Took the whole panel in rather than the one flagged line, and the conversation lasted two minutes instead of generating three more tests.

4 2BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register