🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersThyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — anyone have experience?

Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — anyone have experience?

rick_sfbay Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 6:56 PM 31 replies 2,169 viewsPage 1 of 7
This thread is more than 23 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
rick_sfbay
Member
289
1,234
Jan 2025
San Francisco, CA
Jul 9, 2024 at 6:56 PM#1

Putting this up for argument rather than for agreement. I have read it twice and I am still not certain what it supports.

Routine calcitonin screening is not recommended and does more harm than good in this population — the false-positive rate is high and the workup is invasive. The rodent medullary thyroid carcinoma signal that drives the labelling has not translated into a human signal, but a personal or family history of MTC or MEN2 is a genuine contraindication rather than a formality. Separately, TSH is worth having at baseline because hypothyroidism explains fatigue that people will otherwise blame on the drug.

Where I think it is weakest: the subgroup findings are the part I trust least — with enough subgroups something is always significant, and these were not all pre-registered.

The bit I cannot resolve on my own is why calcitonin screening is not recommended when the label carries a thyroid warning, because those two facts look contradictory from the outside. Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
27 22mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh, james_edin and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Jul 9, 2024 at 7:15 PM#2
rick_sfbay said:
Routine calcitonin screening is not recommended and does more harm than good in this population — the false-positive rate is high and the workup is…

Thyroid cancer screening labs for thyroid monitoring — addressing the boxed warning concern with actual data:

Calcitonin level: 4.0 pg/mL (normal <10). Checked at baseline, month 6, and month 12. Rock stable, no upward trend.

Thyroid ultrasound: normal, no nodules at month 12.

The MTC risk from rodent studies has not been confirmed in human post-marketing data across millions of patient-years. The boxed warning is a regulatory precaution based on animal data. While monitoring is prudent, the clinical risk appears to be negligible.

26 21mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
Jul 9, 2024 at 7:34 PM#3
rick_sfbay said:
Routine calcitonin screening is not recommended and does more harm than good in this population — the false-positive rate is high and the workup is…

Pushing back on rick_sfbay here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

Last edited: Jul 10, 2024 at 12:34 AM
25 20Dr.NutriCornell, pam_stl, wei_SG and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
NurseAsh_DET
Member
356
1,567
Sep 2024
Detroit, MI
Jul 9, 2024 at 7:53 PM#4

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

24 19labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
amy_econ_NJ
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Princeton, NJ
Jul 9, 2024 at 9:33 PM#5
DataDave said:
Thyroid cancer screening labs for thyroid monitoring — addressing the boxed warning concern with actual data: Calcitonin level: 4.0 pg/mL (normal…

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

23 18NurseLeah_Nash, gary_naperville, sean_dublin and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1237

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register