Dr.NephBHM_UK said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.NephBHM_UK said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.NephBHM_UK said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Coming at Dr.NephBHM_UK’s question from a different direction. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from Dr.NephBHM_UK — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
hank_denver said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.