Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at PharmD_Rodriguez’s question from a different direction. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOld thread, but it comes up first when you search for this, so it is worth updating. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
One thing that is still open after PharmD_Rodriguez’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?