Dr.PainCLE said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.PainCLE said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.PainCLE said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
VanRx_Mike said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
I read this differently from VanRx_Mike, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.