emily_PDX said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
emily_PDX said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
emily_PDX said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
james_edin said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.