Following on from PedsEndoPhilly — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Following on from PedsEndoPhilly — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
steph_laguna said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
steph_laguna said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultssteph_laguna said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.