Apr 19, 2026 at 3:21 AM#21
Following on from anna.melb_AU — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
46 19lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 19, 2026 at 10:23 AM#22
MarkLI_maint said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
47 20fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 19, 2026 at 5:25 PM#23
MarkLI_maint said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
Last edited: Apr 19, 2026 at 8:25 PM
48 21LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsApr 20, 2026 at 12:27 AM#24
MarkLI_maint said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
49 22carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI, marco_milano and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 20, 2026 at 7:28 AM#25
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
50 23sarah_nash92, FitDadDave, RunnerRach and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report