DanielChem_CHI said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Pushing back on DanielChem_CHI here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
DanielChem_CHI said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
DanielChem_CHI said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
LipidDoc_ATL said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Mine went the same way, slower.