LipidDoc_ATL said:

If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.

Coming at LipidDoc_ATL’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. No action needed from anybody.

quinn_sf said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

I read this differently from quinn_sf, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

quinn_sf said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.