🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingUnderstanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you? Page 2

Understanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you?

Dr.LipidDallas Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 5:58 AM 21 replies 1,049 viewsPage 2 of 5
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Mar 28, 2026 at 9:08 AM#6
Dr.LipidDallas said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 5 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.4% to 99.2%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

17 12sarah_nash92, FitDadDave, RunnerRach and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tom_AK
New Member
28
112
Jan 2026
Anchorage, AK
Mar 28, 2026 at 10:22 AM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

Last edited: Mar 28, 2026 at 2:22 PM
16 11VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
Mar 28, 2026 at 11:36 AM#8
bri_stats said:
Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$151, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$201
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$101

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

15 10PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.LipidDallas
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Dallas, TX
Mar 28, 2026 at 12:50 PM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

14 9lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jason_sac26
New Member
34
123
Jan 2026
Sacramento, CA
Mar 28, 2026 at 6:45 PM#10
Dr.NephBHM_UK said:
Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik: Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$151, 10-14 day turnaround…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Mar 28, 2026 at 8:45 PM
42 15Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register