🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMASH / Liver DiseaseLiver biopsy changes on semaglutide — looking for input

Liver biopsy changes on semaglutide — looking for input

Dr.GutHealth Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 8:18 AM 29 replies 2,184 viewsPage 1 of 6
This thread is more than 19 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Oct 19, 2024 at 8:18 AM#1

Putting this up for argument rather than for agreement. I have read it twice and I am still not certain what it supports.

The mechanism that matters here is not stomach emptying, it is central. GLP-1 receptor agonism in the arcuate nucleus stimulates POMC neurons and suppresses AgRP/NPY signalling, which is why the effect is appetite and food salience rather than physical fullness. Delayed gastric emptying largely tachyphylaxes over the first months; the appetite effect does not.

Where I think it is weakest: the follow-up is short relative to how long people actually take these drugs, so durability is an assumption here rather than a finding.

What I am after is whether anyone has held at a sub-maximal dose long term and kept the result, or whether the maintenance data only exists at 2.4mg. Tell me what I have not thought of.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
45 15VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
Oct 19, 2024 at 9:36 AM#2
Dr.GutHealth said:
The mechanism that matters here is not stomach emptying, it is central.

All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule. Anyone who slowed the ladder for tolerability is on a different, flatter curve, and comparing yourself with the published mean will make you feel like a non-responder when you are not.

44 14Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor, JenMemphis and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Oct 19, 2024 at 10:54 AM#3
Dr.GutHealth said:
The mechanism that matters here is not stomach emptying, it is central.

I will push back on the "any working dose is fine" framing. The maintenance evidence sits overwhelmingly at the top studied dose, and the extension data shows regain tracking dose reduction rather than tracking stopping. Holding low is reasonable; pretending it is evidentially equivalent is not.

43 13julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
Oct 19, 2024 at 12:12 PM#4

This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak. People who dose late are not losing a peak, they are letting the trough fall, and the appetite effect tracks the trough.

42 12SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF, A1cHero_PHX and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RickReta_CO
Member
312
1,234
Jan 2025
Colorado
Oct 19, 2024 at 7:46 PM#5
Dr.NutriCornell said:
All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule.

That holds for the injectable. The oral formulation has different absorption behaviour and the dose numbers are not interchangeable, which is worth saying out loud because people quote them as if they were.

41 11LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

Survodutide MASH Phase 2b — histological improvement data9 replies
Semaglutide and MASH — liver fat reduction quantification13 replies
Non-invasive MASH biomarkers — FibroScan, ELF, FIB-4 on GLP-110 replies
ALT normalization rates on GLP-1 — pooled trial data20 replies
GLP-1 hepatoprotection — direct vs indirect mechanisms16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register