🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingInter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024 Page 3

Inter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

sean_dublin Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 12:36 PM 30 replies 1,343 viewsPage 3 of 6
Dr.AddMedPHL
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 1, 2026 at 2:11 AM#11
PeptideChemSF said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 4 times from my current compounder.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

11 9FitDadDave, RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RickReta_CO
Member
312
1,234
Jan 2025
Colorado
Mar 2, 2026 at 10:54 PM#12
RetaRick_CA said:
Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity.

That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

Last edited: Mar 3, 2026 at 3:54 AM
12 10jim_asheville, matt_MKE, Dr.ReproEndo and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Mar 4, 2026 at 7:35 PM#13
PeptideChemSF said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 4 times from my current compounder.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 62 submitted tests:

  • 82% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 12% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 6% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

13 11MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Mar 6, 2026 at 4:15 PM#14
sean_dublin said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.

Day 1: 99.0% purity
Day 14: 98.5% purity
Day 28: 98.4% purity

Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.

Last edited: Mar 6, 2026 at 8:15 PM
14 12BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros, KetoKyle and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Mar 8, 2026 at 12:55 PM#15

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out.

15 13PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register