🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingInter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024 Page 5

Inter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

sean_dublin Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 12:36 PM 30 replies 1,343 viewsPage 5 of 6
NeuroNate
Senior Member
2,890
16,789
Dec 2023
Chicago, IL
Mar 19, 2026 at 4:11 PM#21
sophie_paris said:
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed: Main peak retention time:…

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.3% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 8 business days.

The test costs ~$123 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: Mar 19, 2026 at 10:11 PM
42 15jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Mar 27, 2026 at 6:52 PM#22

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

43 16VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.AddMedPHL
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Apr 4, 2026 at 9:28 PM#23

Following on from sophie_paris — and this may be the naive question:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

Last edited: Apr 4, 2026 at 11:28 PM
44 17mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92, FitDadDave and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
JennaRN
Senior Member
1,987
8,923
Mar 2024
Colorado
Online
Apr 13, 2026 at 12:00 AM#24
kate.chem said:
Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

45 18RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mona_PHX
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 21, 2026 at 2:26 AM#25
kate.chem said:
Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.

46 19MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register