🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCOA red flag compilation — what worked for you? Page 5

COA red flag compilation — what worked for you?

Dr.PathRoch Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 8:28 AM 28 replies 1,232 viewsPage 5 of 6
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Feb 23, 2026 at 4:40 AM#21

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

37 10JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BenResearch_OR
Senior Member
2,456
11,234
Dec 2023
Oregon
Feb 24, 2026 at 10:08 AM#22

Following on from Dr.PulmRoch — and this may be the naive question:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

38 11PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Feb 25, 2026 at 3:35 PM#23
LabKate said:
Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Last edited: Feb 25, 2026 at 5:35 PM
39 12LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
tampaLisa73
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Tampa, FL
Feb 26, 2026 at 9:01 PM#24
LabKate said:
Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

Last edited: Feb 26, 2026 at 10:01 PM
40 13mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92, FitDadDave and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
rachel_ABQ
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Albuquerque, NM
Feb 28, 2026 at 2:26 AM#25
LabKate said:
Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

41 14Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register