🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingUnderstanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you? Page 5

Understanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you?

LondonLisa Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:14 AM 38 replies 2,088 viewsPage 5 of 8
rachel_ABQ
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Albuquerque, NM
Apr 26, 2025 at 10:55 PM#21
pete_manc_UK said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Same pattern here, and in the same order.

13 11nick_newbie, DadBodDave, AmyNC_wife and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DadBodDave
Member
187
923
Nov 2024
Ohio
Apr 29, 2025 at 11:58 AM#22
pete_manc_UK said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 5 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.8% to 99.6%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

14 12JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
May 2, 2025 at 12:59 AM#23
pete_manc_UK said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 12 business days.

The test costs ~$121 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: May 2, 2025 at 2:59 AM
15 13SteveThurs, B12Beth, RickReta_CO and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
May 4, 2025 at 1:59 PM#24

Following on from pete_manc_UK — and this may be the naive question:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

16 14amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JessicaH_TX
Senior Member
4,123
13,456
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
May 7, 2025 at 2:57 AM#25
Dr.NateNeph said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

Last edited: May 7, 2025 at 6:57 AM
17 15tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register