🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersKidney function on semaglutide — eGFR and UACR improvements Page 2

Kidney function on semaglutide — eGFR and UACR improvements

Dr.RenalNash Sun, Jun 7, 2026 at 3:28 AM 21 replies 419 viewsPage 2 of 5
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:34 AM#6

One concrete data point for the thread. Worth knowing that the injection site changes very little. Abdomen, thigh and upper arm are bioequivalent for semaglutide, so a site change is not a plausible explanation for a bad week.

Last edited: Jun 7, 2026 at 6:34 AM
15 18pete_nash, hank_denver, carlos_SATX and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.DermMIA
Member
456
2,123
May 2024
Miami, FL
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:37 AM#7

Following on from Dr.PulmRoch — and this may be the naive question:

Whether anyone has held at a sub-maximal dose long term and kept the result, or whether the maintenance data only exists at 2.4mg?

16 19Dr.RenalNash, LipidDoc_ATL, BariatricNurseD and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:39 AM#8
SleepDoc_PDX said:
Worth knowing that the injection site changes very little.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Steady state is the thing most people miss. The terminal half-life is about a week, so every dose step takes four to five weeks to fully express itself. Judging a step at day ten is judging the ascent, not the plateau, and it is the single commonest reason people escalate before they needed to.

17 20MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:41 AM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me. I was escalating because the number was available, not because I had stopped responding.

18 21anders_CPH, Dr.NutriCornell, pam_stl and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FranDenver
Member
267
1,123
Oct 2024
Denver, CO
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:53 AM#10
sophie_paris said:
Steady state is the thing most people miss.

All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule. Anyone who slowed the ladder for tolerability is on a different, flatter curve, and comparing yourself with the published mean will make you feel like a non-responder when you are not.

4 4GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register