PharmHunterJen said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
PharmHunterJen said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Happy to go further on any of that.
One thing that is still open after raj_cambridge’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsquinn_sf said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.