Oct 20, 2024 at 12:26 PM#51
Dr.NateNeph said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Mine went the same way, slower.
30 3FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 23, 2024 at 12:14 AM#52
Dr.NateNeph said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Coming at Dr.NateNeph’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
31 4Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 25, 2024 at 12:01 PM#53
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
32 5KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOct 27, 2024 at 11:46 PM#54
Following on from Dr.NateNeph — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Last edited: Oct 28, 2024 at 5:46 AM
33 6JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Oct 30, 2024 at 11:30 AM#55
Old thread, but it comes up first when you search for this, so it is worth updating. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
34 7claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report