🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersA1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my results so far Page 7

A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my results so far

AttorneyGrant Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:11 PM 58 replies 2,678 viewsPage 7 of 12
Dr.SportsMedIN
Senior Member
1,456
6,789
Feb 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 30, 2024 at 9:01 PM#31
AttorneyGrant said:
Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

18 16lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LondonLisa
Member
912
3,456
Mar 2024
London, UK
Sep 2, 2024 at 10:20 AM#32
AttorneyGrant said:
Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.

No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.

Last edited: Sep 2, 2024 at 12:20 PM
19 17Dr.MetabolicMD, RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JessicaH_TX
Senior Member
4,123
13,456
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Sep 4, 2024 at 11:37 PM#33
AttorneyGrant said:
Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

20 18kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Sep 7, 2024 at 12:53 PM#34

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

Last edited: Sep 7, 2024 at 3:53 PM
21 19TinaHashiRN, robert_kc, dan_philly and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Sep 10, 2024 at 2:07 AM#35
SarahChen_PharmD said:
Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.

22 20lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
15678912

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register