sarah_TO said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
sarah_TO said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Posting only so the count is not one.
sarah_TO said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Coming at sarah_TO’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Found this through search years later and it is still the best discussion of the question, so adding one thing. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after sarah_TO’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
lisa_labSD said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.