🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionCreatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — what worked for you?

Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — what worked for you?

A1cHero_PHX Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 5:38 AM 37 replies 1,327 viewsPage 1 of 8
A1cHero_PHX
Member
523
2,678
Jul 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 2, 2026 at 5:38 AM#1

I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass. Not as much as I expected to, but the idea that training prevents it entirely is not what my scan says.

What I actually want to know is what fraction of loss being lean mass is actually normal, because the numbers quoted here range from 10% to 40% and cannot all be right.

I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

19 14zoe_NC, Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 2, 2026 at 5:44 AM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. The intervention that works is boring and well evidenced: resistance training two to three times a week at a genuine effort, protein at 1.4 to 2.0 g/kg of reference body weight, and not making the deficit larger than the training can support. Cardio does not protect lean mass and in a deep deficit competes with recovery.

18 13PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
carl_compliance
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Raleigh, NC
Apr 2, 2026 at 5:50 AM#3
Dr.MetabolicMD said:
The intervention that works is boring and well evidenced: resistance training two to three times a week at a genuine effort, protein at 1.4 to 2.0…

Agreed on the ranges, with the condition that a single DEXA is not a measurement, it is one draw from a distribution. Hydration status moves the lean compartment by a kilogram or more between scans, so any comparison of scans done at different times of day or different hydration states is noise.

17 12ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 2, 2026 at 5:56 AM#4
A1cHero_PHX said:
I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. The honest range is roughly 20 to 40% of total loss as lean mass without deliberate resistance training, and roughly 10 to 20% with it plus adequate protein. Both numbers need a caveat that matters: "lean mass" on a DEXA is not muscle. It includes water, glycogen and the lean fraction of organs, and glycogen alone carries about three grams of water per gram. A large early lean drop is mostly the glycogen and water going, which is why the first scan flatters and the second is the honest one.

Last edited: Apr 2, 2026 at 6:56 AM
16 11DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
KevinCompounds
VIP Member
5,432
18,234
Dec 2023
Nevada
Apr 2, 2026 at 6:27 AM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

A1cHero_PHX said:
...the muscle loss concern with lean mass...

This is a legitimate and well-studied concern. Let me put some numbers on it:

In STEP 1, approximately 39% of weight lost was lean mass. However, the Lundgren 2024 study showed that structured resistance training reduced this to ~25% lean mass loss.

Context matters: at BMI 35+, you're carrying excess lean mass to support the extra weight. Losing some lean mass is expected and not inherently harmful if you maintain adequate muscle function through exercise.

The solution isn't avoiding the medication — it's combining it with proper exercise and protein intake.

15 10NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1238

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register