A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

quinn_sf said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Pushing back on quinn_sf here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.

quinn_sf said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.

quinn_sf said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.