TrialNerd_Beth said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
TrialNerd_Beth said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at TrialNerd_Beth’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from TrialNerd_Beth — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
raj_cambridge said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
I read this differently from raj_cambridge, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.