DoseLogDan said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
traveltech_sara said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardstraveltech_sara said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Following up because I said I would. I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking. It resolved, and I cannot prove which half of that did it.